Search Weight Loss Topics:

Home » Diets that Work » Confused about what you should be eating? You don’t need to be – The Sydney Morning Herald

Its a combination of factors, say the pair, including the development of the food industry over the last century, which has taken advantage of our evolutionary desire for sweet, salty and fatty foods with their constant assault on our senses using hyper-palatable non-foods; the proliferation of people peddling various diets; and profiting off nutrition pseudo-confusion and our desire for a silver bullet as Bittman, an acclaimed food writer and advisor on food policy at Columbia University, puts it.

Loading

Katz suspects that the authors of many nutrition books peddle misinformation on purpose because its highly profitable and then we all eat it up, wanting it to be true.

In most parts of the world where people obtain the greatest health and sustainability benefits of diet, there is no diet news. They eat the way generations have been eating, Katz says over the phone from New York.

The thing, I think, nutrition books get wrong and I think they get it wrong on purpose because its highly profitable is the idea that we should be waiting for some great big epiphany about diet that, if only the right study is done, everything we knew until yesterday would be proved wrong and there would be some new answer sprinkled in pixie dust...

Because were willing to be talked into any cockamamie theory about diet there is no shortage of cockamamie theories out there.

Their intention in writing the book, say the pair, is to have a grown-up conversation about nutrition and what both science and commonsense say.

Science doesnt work like a ping-pong match its not thats right, now this is right, Katz says. The way it works is you slowly accumulate an understanding of whats true and every new study that comes along needs to be put in the context of well exactly what question did they ask, exactly how did they go about trying to answer it and how does it fit with everything we thought we knew up until this morning?

While they dont profess to know everything about nutrition, the body of science does provide a decent picture of the various fads and fashions of food that we become fascinated by.

Intermittent fasting, for instance, may seem as though its endowed with some sort of metabolic magic, they say, but all the trials show it has almost exactly the same effects as if we simply controlled our energy intake by moderating portion sizes each day.

As for arguments for and against certain foods like dairy, they say it depends on the persons overall diet, what the food is replacing and broader arguments around the impact on the environment.

Diets like keto, which promote greater meat intake, are just silly, Katz argues, saying its absolutely critical we cut back for both environmental and human health reasons . Besides, he adds: We don't know that it's safe, we dont know people can stay on it and we dont know if it's good for health over the long-term ... Almost everything important, we dont know.

As for worrying about what our macronutrient breakdown should be, they say, dont bother, because we can have a really good or a really bad diet thats high or low in carbohydrates, high or low in fat and high or low in protein.

If you focus on foods and foods in balance, theres no way to get it wrong, Katz says. If you pick a nutrient to focus on... there seem to be innumerable ways to get it wrong.

Loading

So where does that leave us? Ideally, deciding to ditch the pseudo-science and the seemingly contradictory findings of nutrition science headlines and returning simply to the basics of real food, in whatever combination we personally enjoy.

Its still not going to be easy because so much of our culture tries to talk you into doing the wrong thing; it tries to get you to buy a sequence of diet books, tries to peddle you an ever-changing variety of junk food. We used to get it right because the only food back in the day was real food and now weve invented all kinds of frankenfood, Katz says.

If you want to do it and you decide its important to you, you absolutely can do it. Real food is available to you. You absolutely can have a relationship with food where you love food and food loves you back and loves the planet back.

As soon as we all decide wed rather get it right for the lifetime rather than keep trying whats new and shiny in every news cycle, weve taken a great big stride forward.

Sarah Berry is a lifestyle and health writer at The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age.

Read more here:
Confused about what you should be eating? You don't need to be - The Sydney Morning Herald

Your Full Name
Your Email
Your Phone Number
Select your age (30+ only)	30313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120
Select Your US State	Select Your StateAlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWashington,DCWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
Program Choice	Select Your ProgramInjectable HGHInjectable TestoteroneInjectable SermorelinInjectable Weight LossInjectable HCG DietInjectable Vitamins
Confirm over 30 years old	Yes
Confirm that you resident in USA	Yes
This is a Serious Inquiry	Yes
Message:

Home » Diets that Work » Confused about what you should be eating? You don’t need to be – The Sydney Morning Herald