Search Weight Loss Topics:




Jun 14

Which diet is best for long-term weight loss? – Health …

Long Term Weight Loss Comments Off on Which diet is best for long-term weight loss? – Health …

Brent Hofacker

Recent studies examined different approaches to dieting.

Two new diet studies that appear to reach opposite conclusions on what works better for weight loss have left me scratching my head. Both were published last week in highly respected medical journals, but one found that following a high-fat, Atkins-style diet for 12 months led to more weight loss than a low-fat diet, while the other found that it didnt matter which diet people followed; they all lost similar amounts of weight over the course of a year simply by cutting calories.

The first finding, published last Monday in the Annals of Internal Medicine, randomly assigned nearly 150 people to follow either a low-fat or low-carbohydrate eating plan and found that those in the low-carbohydrate group lost an average of nearly 8 pounds more by the end of the study than those who followed a low-fat diet. The low-carbohydrate group which capped their carbohydrates at 30 percent of total calories also lost more body fat compared to muscle and experienced a greater improvement in their cholesterol levels and overall heart disease risk compared to those who limited their fat intake to no more than 30 percent of calories.

Continue reading below

On the other hand, a review of 48 randomized weight loss trials published last Tuesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that both low-fat and low-carbohydrate diets led to a 16-pound weight loss over a year compared to following no diet. This led the researchers to conclude that weight loss differences between diet plans like the low-carbohydrate Atkins and Zone diets and low-fat Ornish plan were minimal and that overweight folks should try any diet thats easy to stick with in order to lose weight and keep it off.

I asked cardiologist Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, dean of the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, to sort out the confusion. Here are edited excerpts from our interview.

How is it possible that two groups of reputable researchers could reach such diametrically opposed findings on these diet studies? There are two important differences between these studies that show theyre not contradictory. In the single trial published in the Annals journal, researchers didnt ask people to reduce their calorie intake but just instructed them to change the composition of their diet eating fewer carbohydrates or less fat. In the JAMA meta-analysis looking at commercial diet plans, participants reduced how much they ate and also altered their diet composition, so its impossible to know what actually led to the weight loss.

The meta-analysis also didnt determine how much of the weight lost was fat and how much was muscle. In the single trial, researchers determined that study participants lost 1.5 percent more body fat following a low-carbohydrate diet compared to those who followed a low-fat diet.

Do calories still matter, or do we not need to think about portions if following an Atkins-style eating plan? If you want to lose weight fairly quickly, cutting calories will help you succeed, and it doesnt really matter whether you eat fewer carbohydrates or less fat. But its hard to cut calories long term, which is why so many people who lose weight gain it back over time. If youre willing to change the kinds of foods youre eating, you can lose weight slowly over time and keep it off. Thats what the Annals study found.

See original here:
Which diet is best for long-term weight loss? - Health ...

Related Posts

    Your Full Name

    Your Email

    Your Phone Number

    Select your age (30+ only)

    Select Your US State

    Program Choice

    Confirm over 30 years old

    Yes

    Confirm that you resident in USA

    Yes

    This is a Serious Inquiry

    Yes

    Message:



    matomo tracker